Ronald Jimenez (John Lloyd Cruz) is 27 going 13; mentally that is. But he is about to graduate seventh grade. Helping him catch up with school work is Bessy Buenaventura (Jessy Mendiola), his kind-hearted teacher and the school president’s niece.
Though Ronald is “developmentally delayed”, his functionality approaches “borderline
normal”. Still slower than most, he is able to perform tasks and
function like most people. In fact, he's a brilliant gardener in school where he works part-time in exchange of his admission. Back home, he lives with lesbian “father” Santi (Sylvia Sanchez) and cross-dressing “mother” Nando (Vince de
Jesus), his biological parents. He is surrounded by the oddball horde who populates the comedy bar where his parents work.
Meanwhile, grief palpably percolates in the Bien household still reeling from the death of son Martin (Enrique Gil) who perished in a vehicular accident. It has been a year since but Amanda (Gretchen Barretto) is still wrapped in her own guilt and loss that she is unable to move on.
Hubby Julian (Richard Gomez) just wants to start anew so he wants their marriage annulled. To facilitate this, he has decided to sell their house, an idea that Amanda resists, “Ayokong makalimutan si Martin.” But a sensational rape case sweeps the Biens out of their own misery.
When a rape video involving Ronald and his teacher Bessy goes viral, Amanda
gets asked by her friend Lallie Laperal (Vivian
Velez) to help out. Amanda is, after all, Bessy’s godmother. Meanwhile, Santi
and Nando pursue Julian to handle Ronald’s case. Unknown to the grieving
couple, Ronald was Martin’s good friend when he was still hosting his
Payatas feeding program. Ronald is even privy to some of the Bien’s internal
dispute, not the least of which is Julian’s past infidelity.
To honor the memory of her son, Amanda convinces Julian to the take the
case in exchange of her signing the annulment paper. Julian can only acquiesce. What happens to Bessy? Did Ronald, who regularly watches porn
videos borrowed from a friend, force himself on the only lady who’s shown him affection? Did he have violent streaks? The video (which shows Bessy parrying Ronalds’ advances) doesn't lie, does it? How can
Bessy’s shouts (“Tama na, Ronald!”)
be indicative of anything but rape?
As legal dramas go, Chito Rono's "The Trial" examines a world of flawed characters and dysfunctional families navigating a consciously litigious and supercilious society. It isn't easy to second guess its narrative trail. The story telling,
from Enrico Santos and Kriz Gazmen’s script, is quite fluid. The build up
towards the climax engages the viewer into one resolute viewing. As audience, you’re
transfixed on your seat, with bated breath, while the plot gradually unravels into one
suspenseful denouement. Mainstream drama
has never been this riveting.
“The Trial”, inspired by a script
originally written by Ricky Lee, is
a pondering on intents and actions, of causes and effects, and how perception
of truth is easily carved by man’s idea of what normal or abnormal is. In so
many ways, our existence is defined by these scruples. Moreover, we’re made to
scrutinize how some people face bereavement, palpably depicted in extreme
contrast by Amanda and Julian’s behavior towards each other.
Grief is dealt with in different ways; some more destructive than
others. The past, just like history, has its own relevance, as when Julian
watches random videos of his family prior to the accident – quite wistfully
gripping in its laidback demeanour. Looking back allows us to see how far we’ve
strayed from our intended paths. I realize that there are situations far more
devastating than the actual tragedy.
The movie romps away with superlative performances. Gretchen Barretto unexpectedly scintillates
with devastating sincerity. In a role that’s conveniently a claptrap for
overzealous sentimentality, Barretto is an enthralling study of thespic
authority. You could feel her pain in every scene. When she finally runs after
Ronald and remembers a similar incident involving her son, it becomes one of the most
heart breaking scenes I've had to endure at the cinema this year. Suddenly you
realize that it was Amanda’s moment of closure. If cinema were meant to move
people like that, then you know it has served its purpose well.
Vince de Jesus, as gender-bending
Nando, beautifully delivers a performance that shall define his acting career
from here on. In fact, his scenes are high-wire acts, vacillating between comic
and poignant (e.g. his valedictory scene with John Lloyd during their victory
party). One of my favourite scenes involves Sylvia
Sanchez as she recalls how Ronald was once bullied ("ang pula ng siopao"), ending up with blood on
his forehead. This would be Sanchez’s most memorable, if uneven, turn as an
actress. Unfortunately, her other scenes needed a bit of restraint because
wrath or disappointment isn’t essentially realized by sheer auditory volume or nerve-popping
histrionics. People don't always shout when hurt.
We’ve always thought of Jessy
Mandiola as an adorable but bland pretty face. “Call Center Girl”, anyone? But not anymore. With this star turn, Mendiola
is on her way to joining Star Cinema’s stellar league of A-list dramatic actresses (Bea Alonzo, Erich Gonzales, Angelica Panganiban,
Iza Calzado, Maja Salvador) as she bowls us over with quiet power in "The Trial".
Despite brevity of
scenes (she is actually not seen in almost a third of the movie), her presence
lingers in your head.
There are several worth mentioning where she displays
cinematic brilliance: her reaction after failing to answer a student’s question
(about the difference between genetic drift and random mutation) while being
observed by a CHED supervisor. Her deceptively “ordinary” scenes with her abusive boyfriend Benjamin
Alves were likewise affecting. After all, what is there to fight for when
someone you love has seen through your self-worth. Then there’s the scene when
she tells Ronald, “Ikaw ang pinakamabait
kong kaibigan sa buong mundo.” Mendiola, I suspect, is still evolving in
her craft. Isn't that exciting for someone who’s a relative upstart in the
business?
John Lloyd Cruz is a virtual force
of nature. He inhabits Ronald Jimenez with fierce earnestness, it’s hard to
presuppose his performance the way we can’t second guess persons with
intellectual crutches. He is never predictable. Cruz, in attacking a character,
combines intellect and intuition, and he’s quite consistent in it. His
exquisite command of craft is evident in several scenes, like when he tells his teacher, “Ma’am Bessy, di
ka naman okay, eh.” Or when he asks Gretchen how Martin’s younger brother
isn’t Amanda’s son: "Paano nangyari yun?". Or when he realizes what Amanda’s asking, “Sikreto nga eh. Akala mo ha?” This list
is long – and is thus proof of Cruz’s enviable commitment to his character.
RESERVATION
We do have reservation about Vivian
Velez’s character. She may have valid concerns, but she is compromised by a
black-and-white characterization. “Punch
line of the academic community?” Don't we just love hyperbole?
“The Trial” compels its
viewers to sit back, if a tad uncomfortably, for an engaging narrative ride. It
doesn’t allow passive spectatorship. You couldn’t help but dissect the motives
presented by its characters – from Ronald to Bessy; from the grieving household
of the Biens to the dysfunctional family of Santi and Nando Jimenez. You even
find yourself examining Lallie Laperal’s motives – or her lawyer’s “too involved” attitude. With its mellifluous
plot unraveling before your very eyes, you expect one perfect story, right? Or was it?
For the sake of discussion, allow me to nitpick. Bessy’s own intellectual
inadequacy is so subtly suggested that we actually believe her predicament,
i.e. that she’s also “slow”. Being that way, such
individuals don’t briskly form conclusions or react with proficient
problem-solving skill. In the scene where Ronald and Bessy engage in sex, when
Bessy saw a phone filming their liaison, she immediately “concocts” a scenario that would make her look like the victim (thus
her repeated cries, “Tama na, Ronald.”)
This reaction seems incongruent to that of a slow mind. Lesser mortals would
just scoot, skedaddle and hide, not engage in improvisational dramatics. Did
she actually anticipate a litigious scenario to unravel as a result of their
indiscretion? She isn’t all that slow, is she?
In another scene where Julian discusses his strategy to save Ronald from
imminent incarceration, Sylvia Sanchez’s undue wrath seemed too extreme – her vocal
histrionics almost dug a hole in my tympanic membrane. After all, she was
talking to an illustrious lawyer who’s had years of experience - and who had to
be pursued to take the case. You’d think she’d be circumspect dealing with someone
who agreed to help – instead she flew off the handle! Who cared if their family
would look eccentric before the court? Eccentricity won’t send them to jail.
Wasn’t their goal saving Ronald at all cost?
THE SLAPPING LAWYER
Now let’s discuss my "favorite" part. Attorney Patricia Celis, portrayed by
the usually brilliant Isay Alvarez,
meets Amanda for the first time. The lawyer carries undue vitriol, regarding
Amanda with absolute acrimony. She's haughty and morose. You would think that Atty. Celis has a personal stake on the case. You’d likewise mistake her as the aggrieved party. As counsellor, wasn’t she
supposed to approach the case with sobriety and rational savvy? Which lawyer
involves herself in a slapping incident with a would-be witness? Talk about misplaced
theatrics. But then Alvarez is a luminary in Philippine theater. How very
apropos.
As for the scene where Ronald finally takes the witness stand, was
Bessy’s admission from the audience gallery even admissible in court? (She
was asked if Ronald’s confessions were true.) Shouldn’t she take an oath first
– that she’s telling the truth and nothing but – before anything she divulges would
actually amount to much under the court of law? What’s the judge doing while
this drama was happening? Cogitating on her morning bowel movement? Was she
dozing off? You see, more credible admissions have been deemed inadmissible
under the wrong platform. How different is this?
The film boasts of a hundred and one messages that make us think. That
misunderstandings don’t exactly define a bad relationship. That a person could
be worth our affection despite his inadequacies. And so on. This much is true –
“The Trial” deserves to be seen by
anyone who claims to love good movies.
John Lloyd Cruz |
Jessy Mendiola |
Benjamin Alvez joining his Tito Piolo in ABS-CBN? |
Enrique Gil |
No comments:
Post a Comment